The decision results from a lawsuit filed by the European Commission which accused the Portuguese State of failing to ensure that several public entities, including local and regional administrations and health entities, paid their commercial debts within the stipulated deadlines.
The European Commission, when bringing the action, argued that late payments are a continuous and systematic violation of this European directive, negatively affecting the competitiveness and viability of companies.
According to the ruling, “by failing to ensure that its public entities effectively comply with the payment deadlines set out in article 4, paragraph 3, and paragraph 4, subparagraph b), of Directive 2011/7/EU, the Portuguese Republic has not fulfilled its obligations under these provisions.”
The European Directive that served as the basis for the European Commission's accusation establishes that Member States must guarantee that public entities pay their commercial debts within 30 days, with this period being able to be extended up to 60 days for public entities providing health care, as long as they are duly justified.
However, between 2013 and 2022, several Portuguese public entities, including local administration, health entities, and the Autonomous Regions of Madeira and the Azores, did not consistently comply with established payment deadlines.
The pre-litigation procedure began in 2017 when the European Commission notified Portugal about the violation of the obligations of Directive 2011/7/EU. The State responded by indicating the set of measures adopted, but the European Commission considered them insufficient and issued a reasoned opinion in October 2017.
At Portugal's request, the procedure was suspended between 2018 and 2020 to allow the implementation of new measures. During this period, Portugal sent several reports to the Commission, but delays persisted.
The Court of Justice concluded that, despite improvements in payment deadlines over the years, Portugal was unable to ensure effective compliance with payment deadlines. “The fact that the situation of late payments by public entities in commercial transactions covered by Directive 2011/7 is improving cannot prevent the Court of Justice from declaring that a Member State has not fulfilled its obligations under the law of the Union”, reads the ruling.
Portugal was ordered to pay the costs of the process, as requested by the European Commission. This decision highlights the importance of strictly complying with payment deadlines in commercial transactions, especially by public entities.
The conviction could lead to a review of the payment practices of public entities in Portugal, promoting greater transparency and efficiency in financial processes.
Everyone ought to be paid on time.
That said, Directive 2011/7 is gross EU overreach, and CJEU's further meddling is unwelcome.
This is a matter for the Portuguese people and for Portuguese courts.
The EU is sticking its nose in too many places.
By Shawn from Other on 11 Jul 2024, 19:51
In this particular case and actually many, many more, the intervention of the EU is more than a welcome breadth of fresh air.
We the Portuguese people have never been able to come to terms with the tremendous level of incompetence and corruption across the board i.e. political public mismanagement of our very hard earned money.
Portugal although seen around the world as a rich country it is one if not the ‘poorest’ in the EU and what is certain is that Portugal is ‘also’ today one of the countries in Europe with the lowest labour productivity, even being able to constantly offer a loss of competitiveness an ever increasing energy in the wrong direction.
And, since according to the Bank of Portugal WE have already received circa €135 billion since inception into the EU (2023) a number I actually find too low however, the €133B is not including of course the -PRR- Billions still pouring in, and since we have only paid into the EU coffers approx. €45 billion (2023) I would say it is not up to us the Portuguese people i.e. the EU has every right to meddle.
By Miguel from Lisbon on 12 Jul 2024, 13:57
If the government is as useless/ corrupt as the old government (I hope it won't be) they will just ignore the ruling, which in turn just screws the SMEs that have to suffer late payments and some will go bankrupt because of this. It was rife in the UK but now it's a lot better.
By DavidClark from Algarve on 14 Jul 2024, 09:47